- SERVICE PROVIDER
St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
This is an organisation that runs the health and social care services we inspect
Urgent and emergency care survey 2022 – type 3 services
Published 25 July 2023
This survey looked at the experiences of people who attended Type 1 or Type 3 urgent & emergency care (UEC) services. The 2022 survey involved 122 trusts with a Type 1 accident and emergency (A&E) department. Fifty-nine of these trusts had direct responsibility for running a Type 3 department (Urgent Treatment Centre). Two different questionnaires were used and trust results are provided separately.
Type 1 services include A&E departments, and may also be known as casualty or emergency departments.
Type 3 services include urgent treatment centres and minor injury units. The survey only includes services directly run by an acute NHS trust.
These are the results for Type 3 services.
This survey looked at the experiences of 29,357 people who attended a Type 1 service in September 2022 and 7,418 people who attended a Type 3 service in September 2022 and, for smaller trusts, August also.
Between November 2022 and March 2023, a questionnaire was sent to:
- 1,250 people who had used Type 1 services at trusts with no eligible Type 3 services, or
- 950 people who had used Type 1 services and 580 people who had used eligible Type 3 services
Responses were received from 95 people at St George's University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust.
-
-
Privacy at reception
having enough privacy if they discussed their condition with the receptionist7.1 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Waiting to speak to a health professional
not having to wait too long before first speaking to a health professional4.1 out of 10
Somewhat worse than expected
-
Waiting to be examined
not having to wait too long before being examined3.0 out of 10
About the same
-
Information about waiting times
those who waited to be examined, being informed how long they would have to wait4.4 out of 10
About the same
-
Updated about waiting times
those who waited to be examined, being kept updated on how long the wait would be2.5 out of 10
About the same
-
Total length of visit to the urgent treatment centre
visit to the urgent treatment centre not lasting too long4.5 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Time to talk
feeling they had enough time to discuss their condition with the health professional8.5 out of 10
About the same
-
Clear explanations about condition and treatment
feeling the health professional explained their condition and treatment in a way they could understand8.2 out of 10
About the same
-
Being listened to
feeling the health professional listened to what they had to say8.8 out of 10
About the same
-
Talking about anxieties or fears
feeling the health professional discussed any anxieties or fears they had about their condition or treatment, if needed6.6 out of 10
About the same
-
Confidence and trust
having confidence and trust in the health professional examining and treating them8.7 out of 10
About the same
-
Acknowledging patients
health professionals not talking in front of them, as if they weren't there8.4 out of 10
Worse than expected
-
Involving family, friend or carer
family, friend or carer having enough opportunity to talk to health professionals, if they wanted toNot available
-
-
-
Information about condition or treatment
being given the right amount of information about their condition or treatment9.0 out of 10
About the same
-
Privacy when examined or treated
being given enough privacy when being examined or treated8.7 out of 10
Worse than expected
-
Communication
not being told one thing by a member of staff and something quite different by another8.9 out of 10
About the same
-
Involvement in decisions
being involved as much as they wanted to be in decisions about their care and treatment8.0 out of 10
About the same
-
Pain control
feeling that staff did all they could to help control their pain, if they were in pain5.9 out of 10
Somewhat worse than expected
-
-
-
Clear explanations about tests
feeling that staff explained why they needed tests in a way they could understand8.5 out of 10
About the same
-
Clear explanations about test results
if they received test results while at the urgent treatment centre, feeling staff explained the results in a way they could understand7.9 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Cleanliness
describing the urgent treatment centre as clean8.8 out of 10
About the same
-
Safety
not feeling threatened by other patients or visitors9.2 out of 10
About the same
-
Access to food and drink
being able to access suitable food and drink while at the urgent treatment centre, if they wanted to5.4 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Information about symptoms
being told about any symptoms to watch for regarding their illness or treatment after going home, if this information was needed6.3 out of 10
About the same
-
Contact information
being told who to contact if they were worried about their condition or treatment after they left the urgent treatment centre7.7 out of 10
About the same
-
Information about self care
being given enough information to care for their condition at home, if this information was needed7.3 out of 10
About the same
-
Transport arrangements
staff discussing their transport arrangements for leaving the urgent treatment centre2.7 out of 10
About the same
-
Health and social care services
staff discussing if any further health or social care services were needed after leaving the urgent treatment centre5.4 out of 10
Worse than expected
-
Care available after leaving the urgent treatment centre
expected care and support being available when needed after leaving the urgent treatment centre6.9 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Respect and dignity
being treated with respect and dignity8.9 out of 10
About the same
-
-
-
Overall view of the urgent treatment centre
feeling that overall they had a good experience7.7 out of 10
About the same
-
About these scores
Most questions are grouped under the section in which they appear in the questionnaire.
We asked people to answer questions about different aspects of their care and treatment. Based on their responses, we gave each NHS trust a score out of 10 for each question (the higher the score the better).
Each trust also received a rating of ‘Much better’, ‘Better’, ‘Somewhat better’, ‘About the same’, ‘Somewhat worse’, ‘Worse’ or ‘Much worse’.
- Much better: the trust is much better for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
- Better: the trust is better for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
- Somewhat better: the trust is somewhat better for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
- About the same: the trust is performing about the same for that particular question as most other trusts that took part in the survey
- Somewhat worse: the trust performed somewhat worse for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
- Worse: the trust did not perform as well for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
- Much worse: the trust performed much worse for that particular question compared to most other trusts that took part in the survey
More detailed information on the methodology is available in the technical document on the UEC survey page.
Where a section score is not present (‘Overall score unavailable’) this is due to a question(s) being missing from that section (‘Not applicable’) meaning that no section score can be produced. Questions have been excluded where too few people answered a question (less than 30 respondents). This is because the uncertainty around the result is too great.