30 November 2023
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We undertook a targeted assessment of the responsive key question at Clover City Practice. The rating for the responsive key question is requires improvement. As the other domains were not reviewed during this assessment, the rating of good will be carried forward from the previous inspection for safe, effective, caring and well-led and the overall rating of the service will remain Good.
Safe – not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection
Effective - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection
Caring - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection
Responsive – requires improvement
Well-led - not inspected, rating of good carried forward from previous inspection
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Clover City Practice on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this assessment.
We carried out a targeted assessment of the responsive key question. Targeted assessments enable us to focus on certain key questions to explore particular aspects of care.
How we carried out the assessment
- This assessment was carried out without a site visit.
- Conducting staff interviews using video conferencing.
- Requesting evidence from the provider and reviewing the appointment system.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we carried out the assessment
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- Although some people were able to access care and treatment in a timely way with the national GP patient survey data showing patients’ overall experience of making an appointment had improved from the previous year, it also showed patient satisfaction had deteriorated over time with regard to accessing the practice by telephone.
- The provider had reviewed patient feedback and had developed an action plan to implement a new appointment system planned for January 2024. However, this was not in place at the time of the assessment.
- Complaints were satisfactorily handled in a timely manner.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Health Care