Archived: Riveredge Dentistry Limited

Updated 29 October 2015

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the registered provider was meeting their obligations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

The inspection was carried out on 12 August 2015 and was led by a CQC Lead Inspector. The team also included a dentist specialist advisor.

The methods that were used to collect information at the inspection included interviewing staff, observations and review of documents.

During the inspection we spoke with a dentist, four dental nurses, one hygienist and the practice manager. We saw policies and procedures, and other records relating to the management of the service. We reviewed 12 CQC comment cards that had been completed. We visited both sites.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?
• Is it effective?
• Is it caring?
• Is it responsive to people’s needs?
• Is it well-led?

These questions therefore formed the framework for the areas we looked at during the inspection.

Updated 29 October 2015

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection on 12 August 2015 to ask the practice the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

The practice is owned and run by an individual. They run the practice from Suite 2, Quayside House, Wylam Wharf, Low Street, Sunderland, Tyne and Wear, SR1 2AD. They also have a branch at 48a Osborne Road, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE2 2AL. The practice provides cosmetic dentistry and primary care dental services to private patients.

The locations are open as follows:

Suite 2, Quayside House, Wylam Wharf, Low Street, Sunderland, Monday to Friday from 9am to 5pm. Late night and Saturday appointments are available by appointment only.

For 48a Osborne Road, Jesmond, Newcastle upon Tyne, appointments are by appointment only on Wednesday from 10am to 4pm.

Between the locations there are two dentists, four dental nurses, a hygienist and a receptionist.

The owner of the practice is the registered provider for the practice. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the practice is run.

We received 12 Care Quality Commission (CQC) comment cards. All the comments were positive about the staff and the services provided.

Our key findings were:

• There was an effective complaints system. Staff recorded complaints and cascaded learning to staff.
• Staff had received safeguarding training, knew how to recognise signs of abuse and how to report it.
• There were sufficient numbers of suitably qualified staff to meet the needs of patients.
• Staff had been trained to manage medical emergencies.
• Infection control procedures were in accordance with the published guidelines.
• Most patient care and treatment was planned and delivered in line with evidence based guidelines, best practice and current regulations.
• Patients received clear explanations about their proposed treatment, costs, benefits and risks and were involved in making decisions about it.
• Patients were treated with dignity and respect and confidentiality was maintained.
• The appointment system met patients’ needs.
• The practice was well-led and staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
• Most governance systems were effective.
• The practice sought feedback from staff and patients about the services they provided.
• The practice manager was in the process of registering with the CQC as the registered manager for the practice.