5 January 2015
During a routine inspection
Ashley Care LLP provides a personal care service for adults who live in their own homes in the Southend on Sea area.
This inspection took place on 5 January 2015.
At our last inspection on 16 December 2013 we asked the provider to take action to make improvements to their complaints system. The provider sent us an action plan and at this inspection they had completed the action in the plan.
The registered manager has been in post since the service was first registered. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us that they were happy with the service they received and that it was ‘first rate.’ They felt safe when the agency’s staff were in their homes. Staff were kind and caring and that they treated them with dignity and respect.
Staff had a good knowledge about how to safeguard people from abuse and they had received regular training and updates to refresh their knowledge. Risks to people’s health and well-being had been assessed and were well managed.
Staff were well trained, supervised and supported to do their work. There was a good recruitment process in place and staff did not start work until all of their pre-employment checks had been carried out. Although there was generally sufficient staff working for the agency there were some problems at weekends or when staff were off sick or on annual leave. The manager had employed more staff to help alleviate this problem and recruitment was on-going.
Medication practice was good. Staff who administered medication had been trained and their competence to administer it had been checked.
People were supported to eat and drink sufficient amounts to meet their needs. Staff had a good knowledge about people’s needs and preferences. The service was responsive to people’s changing needs and ensured that they were met. People knew how to complain and the service had dealt with their complaints appropriately.
The service was well-led and provided people with good quality care. The quality assurance system was effective and improvements had been made as a result of learning from people’s views and opinions.