We carried out this unannounced inspection on 18 January 2016.Park View is located in Salford and provides 24 hour support to people with mental health and learning difficulties. The home is owned by Potensial Limited and is registered with the Care Quality Commission (CQC) to provide care and support for up to nine people.
We carried out our last inspection of Park View in August 2013. At this inspection, we found the service was meeting all standards assessed at that time.
A new manager had started working at the service in September 2015, and was not yet registered with the Care Quality Commission. They told us their application was underway. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People living at the home told us they felt safe. The staff we spoke with demonstrated a good understanding of safeguarding and whistleblowing procedures and how to report concerns.
Staff recruitment procedures were safe. We saw appropriate checks were undertaken before staff began working at the home, such as seeking written references and undertaking DBS (Disclosure Barring Service) checks.
We found people had risk assessments in their support plans detailing control measures to help keep people safe. The service encouraged positive risk taking to promote people’s independence, such as encouraging people to use public transport independently, or walking into town on their own.
We found people’s medication was given to them safely. The people we spoke with told us they received their medication at the prescribed time. We found medication was stored in a secure room and only staff involved with administration had access. People had their own individual medication administration records (MAR) which we saw were signed by staff when medication had been taken. Where people required PRN (as required) medication, there were clear guidelines for staff to follow about when this should be given.
We looked at the staff rotas to see how the service ensured there were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs and keep them safe. We found the service had sufficient skilled staff to meet people's needs, and people who lived at the home confirmed this stating there were enough staff to support them. The staff we spoke with told us they were satisfied with the current staffing levels at the home.
The staff we spoke with told us they had enough training available to them and felt well supported to undertake their work. Staff told us they undertook an induction when they first started working for the service and received regular supervision where they could discuss certain aspects of their work with their manager.
The Mental Capacity Act 2005 (MCA) provides a legal framework for making particular decisions on behalf of people who may lack the mental capacity to do so for themselves. The Act requires that as far as possible people make their own decisions and are helped to do so when needed. When they lack mental capacity to take particular decisions, any made on their behalf must be in their best interests and as least restrictive as possible. At the time of the inspection, there was nobody living at Park View who was subject to a DoLS (Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards). People were able to go out when they wanted and into the local community unaccompanied. We saw staff had received eLearning training on MCA and when questioned, staff demonstrated an understanding of circumstances in which people may be restricted of their liberty.
People said they had enough to eat and drink and were given different choices and alternatives. Where able, people, were given support by staff to prepare their own meals. We were told an evening meal was always prepared by staff and that people who lived at the service were able to contribute where possible. People were encouraged to make their own breakfast and lunch in order to maintain their independence and develop skills in this area.
The people we spoke with were positive about the care and support they received from staff, and several people reported their mental health had improved since living at Park View.
There was a complaints policy and procedure in place, which explained what people needed to do, if they were unhappy with any aspect of the service. People told us they felt complaints would be handled appropriately, although they hadn’t needed to make a complaint since living at the home.
People had a range of in house and community activities available to them. Each person who lived at the home was able to access the community independently, which was something they said they enjoyed.
Both staff and people who lived at the home felt the service was well-led and that the management were approachable. Staff also spoke of a positive culture whilst working at the home and told us they enjoyed their work.
There were systems in place to monitor the quality of service at the home. This included audits of support plans, staff personnel files, medication, the environment and peoples’ finances. We saw that action was taken if any discrepancies were found. Accidents and incidents were also monitored closely through the use of an internal system. We saw prevention measures had been implemented to avoid future re-occurrences.