We undertook an unannounced inspection of this service on 16 April 2015. This service is registered to provide accommodation and care for up to 19 people with a learning disability. However in order to provide single room accommodation for people only 17 people are usually accommodated. At the time of inspection 17 people were living in the service. The service was last inspected in January 2014 and no concerns were identified from that inspection.
The service is located in a residential area of Lydd on the Romney Marsh. It is within walking distance of local amenities, shops and public transport. The service has a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
People told us they liked living in the service and were happy there, they liked the staff and the opportunities they had for going out and doing the things they wanted. Comments included,: “I like living here, I like people here”. “Staff treat us well”. “I get enough food and drink when I want it.” “I like the people who help me”. Health professionals and relatives commented positively about the standard of care people received. Relatives told us that they were kept informed and their views were always sought.
The service is provided in a large period property that required some upgrading. Works that needed to be done had been identified and prioritised for completion but a schedule of timescales had not been implemented; other more urgent works had taken precedence to ensure people were kept safe and warm. The majority of weekly, monthly, and annual safety checks were completed, but the registered manager was unable to confirm that the periodic check of the main electrical installation had been undertaken and was still in date.
There was an established recruitment procedure that required applicants to complete application forms and attend for interview. Interview records were made to support decisions to employ new staff. The service ensured all relevant conduct in employment references; a criminal record check and evidence of personal identity were received prior to new staff commencing work. However, staff records were incomplete and failed to address gaps in employment histories, the medical fitness of applicants and reasons for leaving previous employment in care.
Staff told us they had received a good induction to help them understand and support the needs of people. They said their competency to do so was assessed by senior staff and the registered manager but records of induction and competency assessments of new staff were not completed to show how this was delivered to them and how their competencies and understanding were assessed. Staff told us that a programme of essential training was in place to provide them with the necessary skills to fulfil their role, and records supported this. Staff said the registered manager was proactive in sourcing training for them to do.
People’s concerns were taken seriously and acted upon, but not always recorded to show that proper processes had been followed. Some stand-alone audits were undertaken that included health and safety, medicines and finances, but some of these were not robust or sufficiently in depth to provide assurance that the area assessed was operating effectively. An overarching assessment of service quality was in place but failed to identify the shortfalls highlighted by this inspection.
Our inspection showed staff to be caring and protective of the welfare and wellbeing of the people they supported, and staff showed commitment to ensuring people enjoyed a good quality of life. People were supported to make everyday decisions for themselves, but staff understood when they might need other people to help make some decisions on their behalf. Staff provided support in accordance with the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 and Deprivation of Liberty Safeguards.
People felt safe and cared for by staff. They were supported to live their lives in the way they chose. Where able to, they were supported to maintain their independence or to develop skills, and to undertake tasks within their capabilities. There were enough staff to support people’s needs. There were low levels of accidents and staff understood how to keep people safe and how to use the reporting mechanisms for safeguarding, whistleblowing and accidents and incidents.
Staff told us they had regular supervision and found the registered manager approachable and supportive. Staff demonstrated an in depth knowledge of people’s individual needs and support. Personal care was managed discreetly, and people were provided with the equipment they needed to help with their care and support needs. People were consulted about what they wanted to eat and staff ensured that everyone had enough to eat and drink, and assisted those with special dietary needs. People were supported to access health appointments and their healthcare needs were monitored.
People who used the service and their relatives were asked for their views about the service and felt listened to.
We have identified a number of breaches of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can see what action we told the provider to take at the back of the full version of this report.
We recommend that the service uses the complaints log to record all concerns and complaints to show that these are dealt with appropriately.