We considered our inspection findings to answer questions we always ask;
' Is the service safe?
' Is the service effective?
' Is the service caring?
' Is the service responsive?
' Is the service well-led?
This is a summary of what we found -
Is the service safe?
Risks were properly assessed and managed to protect people from harm and make sure their care was delivered safely.
We found action had been taken on each of the areas of concern identified at our last inspection. These included improved ways of meeting people's nutritional and social needs being introduced, and addressing issues with the heating system at the centre.
The service had appropriate and safe arrangements for assisting people with their prescribed medicines.
Is the service effective?
People's care and treatment was well planned and kept under close review to check it remained effective. People staying at the centre told us they were happy with the care and support they received. One person said, 'They've helped me so much, I'm hoping I'll soon be well enough to go home', and another person commented, 'The staff are all very good, they do a wonderful job'.
Suitable arrangements had been made to support staff by ensuring they were given training updates and had their performance supervised and appraised.
Is the service caring?
Care was provided in line with individuals' needs, and with clear aims of enabling people to return to their own homes, wherever possible. People described the staff as caring and a health professional told us he was 'very impressed' with the staff team and how they supported people.
Is the service responsive?
People's care was planned following a full assessment of their needs and independent skills when they came to stay at the centre. Each person's care and treatment was then reviewed at weekly intervals by a team of professionals, and adapted in response to any changes in their needs.
Is the service well-led?
The manager and staff had good understanding of the ethos of the service and their roles and responsibilities. There were thorough quality assurance processes in place to check that standards were maintained. These included routinely asking people about their care and for feedback on the quality of the service they received.