Updated 5 September 2018
We carried out this announced inspection on 8 August 2018 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.
To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:
• Is it safe?
• Is it effective?
• Is it caring?
• Is it responsive to people’s needs?
• Is it well-led?
These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.
Our findings were:
Are services safe?
We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services effective?
We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services caring?
We found that this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services responsive?
We found that this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Are services well-led?
We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.
Background
The Dental Suite is in Leicester city centre close to the railway station and provides private dental treatment to adults and children.
There is level access into the practice, this is of benefit for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. There are pay and display car parks in the area around the practice.
The dental team includes six dentists, one dental technician, one dental hygienist, four qualified dental nurses, one supervisor and one practice manager. The practice has three treatment rooms, one of which is located on the ground floor.
The practice is owned by an organisation and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the Care Quality Commission as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at the time of this inspection was the practice manager.
On the day of inspection, we received feedback from 14 patients.
During the inspection we spoke with two dentists, three dental nurses, one receptionist, a supervisor and the practice manager. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.
The practice is open: Monday and Tuesday: 9am to 5:30pm, Wednesday: 8.40am to 5.30pm, Thursday: 9am to 6pm, Friday: 9am to 5.30pm. The practice is closed on Saturday and Sunday.
.
Our key findings were:
- The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
- The practice staff had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
- Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment were available.
- The practice had systems to help them manage risk.
- Only one of the X-ray machines had been fitted with rectangular collimation to help reduce the dose of radiation to patients.
- Not every product had a risk assessment in line with the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002.
- The practice staff had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding adults and children.
- The practice had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
- The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
- Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
- The practice did not have an induction hearing loop to assist patients who used a hearing aid.
- The practice was providing preventive care and supporting patients to ensure better oral health.
- The appointment system met patients’ needs.
- The practice had effective leadership and a culture of continuous improvement.
- Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:
- Review the practice's policy for the control and storage of substances hazardous to health identified by the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002, to ensure risk assessments are undertaken for each product.
- Review the practice's protocols and procedures for the use of X-ray equipment in compliance with The Ionising Radiations Regulations 2017 and Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations 2017 and taking into account the guidance for Dental Practitioners on the Safe Use of X-ray Equipment. To ensure all intr-aoral X-ray machines are fitted with rectangular collimation.
- Review the practice's responsibilities to take into account the needs of patients with disabilities and to comply with the requirements of the Equality Act 2010.