• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Ask Butler (UK) Limited

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

2nd Floor, 123 King Street, London, W6 9JG (020) 3397 9636

Provided and run by:
Ask Butler (UK) Limited

Important: This service was previously registered at a different address - see old profile

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 29 March 2019

The inspection:

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (the Act) as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the provider was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Act, to look at the overall quality of the service, and to provide a rating for the service under the Care Act 2014.

Inspection team:

The inspection team consisted of two inspectors.

Service and service type:

Ask Butler (UK) Limited is a domiciliary care agency which provides personal care to people living in their own homes. At the time of the inspection the agency was providing care to 15 people. The service specialises in providing personal care for people receiving palliative care or end of life care in their own homes.

The service had a manager registered with the Care Quality Commission who was also the provider. This means that they are legally responsible for how the service is run and for the quality and safety of the care provided.

Notice of inspection:

We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of the inspection visit because it is small and the registered manager is often out of the office supporting staff or visiting people who use the service. We needed to be sure that they would be in.

What we did:

Before inspection: We used information the provider sent us in the Provider Information Return. (PIR) This is information we ask providers to send us at least once annually to give some key information about the service, what the service does well and improvements they plan to make.

We looked at information we held about the service including notifications they had made to us about notifiable events. We also reviewed all other information sent to us from other stakeholders for example the local authority and members of the public.

During the inspection:

¿ We spoke to the registered manager, the office manager and four care workers.

¿ We reviewed four people’s care records.

¿ We checked the policies and procedures.

¿ We looked at records relating to the management of the service, recruitment, and training records of four care workers.

After the inspection: We spoke to a range of professionals who worked in partnership with the service to plan, arrange and commission care for people who need palliative or end of life care. Due to the frailty of the people receiving care we spoke to three relatives of people using the service to understand their experience of the care provided.

Overall inspection

Good

Updated 29 March 2019

About the service:

Ask Butler is a domiciliary care service that was providing personal care to 15 people in their own homes at the time of the inspection.

For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.

People’s experience of using this service:

¿ People received kind and compassionate care.

¿ Care staff received good support from the management to carry out their role effectively.

¿ Staff had access to a wide range of training relevant to the needs of the people using the service.

¿ Senior managers were present and had a good knowledge of all the people using the service.

¿ Staff felt supported by their managers and could get advice and guidance when they needed it.

¿ There were systems in place to check the quality and effectiveness of the care being provided.

¿ The service had developed emergency contingency plans for when things go wrong.

¿ People were satisfied that the service was doing everything they could to meet the needs of their family member.

¿ Relatives of people receiving care felt staff and management were caring.

¿ The service actively supported people.

¿ The service communicated well with other lead agencies and partners.

¿ There was good communication between the service and other healthcare professionals so.

¿ People’s healthcare needs would be met.

¿ Care plans were not very clear about people’s capacity to consent.

¿ Care plans also did not have details about personal preferences of how people wanted their care.

¿ We went back to the service to ensure that the registered manager had implemented the necessary changes and we are satisfied that the care plans have improved to a satisfactory standard.

Rating at last inspection:

Good (The date the last report was published was 3 September 2016)

Why we inspected:

This was a planned inspection based on the rating at the last inspection. The service remains Good.

Follow up:

Going forward we will continue to monitor this service and plan to inspect in line with our reinspection schedule for those services rated Good.