27 November 2023
During an inspection looking at part of the service
About the service
Our House is a residential care home providing personal care to 8 people with a learning disability or autistic people at the time of the inspection. The service can support up to 8 people.
People’s experience of using this service and what we found
Right Support
People were not supported in a safe, clean, warm and appropriately maintained environment. Risks identified by the fire service and other external safety consultants had not been promptly addressed. Fire doors were propped open with wedges, and flooring was in need of replacement and presented trip hazards in the service’s communal spaces. On the first day of our inspection the service was cold and dirty.
Risks in relation to people’s individual behaviours had not been appropriately identified and mitigated.
In response to feedback during the first day of inspection the provider took action. By the second day of the inspection the service had been cleaned, was noticeably warmer and additional risk assessments had been developed.
Medicines were stored securely; however medicine administration records had not been accurately completed.
People were supported to have choice and control of their lives and staff supported them in the least restrictive way possible and in their best interests. We have made a recommendation in relation to systems for recording assessments of people’s capacity in relation to specific decisions.
Right Care
The service was short staffed and staff and managers were having to complete additional shifts to ensure people’s safety. Necessary recruitment check had not been completed and a third of the staff team had completed less than 50% of the training identified as necessary to meet people’s needs.
Staff understood people’s individual needs and communication preferences. People were confident approaching staff for support and did so without hesitation. Staff supported people to access healthcare services when required.
Staff understood how to protect people from abuse. There were systems in place to ensure people were protected from the risk of financial abuse.
Right Culture
The providers quality assurance systems were ineffective and had failed to ensure prompt action was taken in response to identified safety concerns.
Staff were complimentary of the registered manager and records showed staff had received regular supervision. The roles and responsibilities of the registered manager and nominated individual were understood by staff.
For more details, please see the full report which is on the CQC website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Rating at last inspection and update
The last rating for this service was good (published 1 April 2020).
Why we inspected
The inspection was prompted in part due to concerns received about medicines, staffing levels, staff training, safeguarding and the oversight of the service. A decision was made for us to inspect and examine those risks. We undertook a focused inspection to review the key questions of safe, effective and well-led only. For those key questions not inspected, we used the ratings awarded at the last inspection to calculate the overall rating.
The overall rating for the service has changed from good to requires improvement based on the findings of this inspection.
We have found evidence that the provider needs to make improvements. Please see the safe, effective and well-led sections of this report.
You can read the report from our last comprehensive inspection, by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Our House on our website at www.cqc.org.uk.
Enforcement and Recommendations
We have identified breaches in relation to the premises, risk management, staffing, recruitment and governance at this inspection. In addition, we have made a recommendation in relation to the assessment of people’s capacity.
Please see the action we have told the provider to take at the end of this report.
Full information about CQC’s regulatory response to the more serious concerns found during inspections is added to reports after any representations and appeals have been concluded.
Follow up
We will request an action plan from the provider to understand what they will do to improve the standards of quality and safety. We will work alongside the provider and local authority to monitor progress. We will continue to monitor information we receive about the service, which will help inform when we next inspect.