• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: ODL Dental Surgery

370 Old Street, London, EC1V 9LT (020) 7739 3345

Provided and run by:
Dr. Alejandro Seijas

All Inspections

15 November 2021

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We carried out this announced inspection on 15 November 2021 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission (CQC) inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we usually ask five key questions. However, due to the ongoing pandemic and to reduce time spent on site, only the following three questions were asked:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

These are three of the five questions that form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this practice was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

ODL Dental Surgery is in the City of London and provides private orthodontic and general dental treatment to adults and children.

The practice is located on the lower ground floor of a six storey building close to Moorgate underground station. There is lift access into the practice for people who use wheelchairs or those with pushchairs. The practice has ten treatment rooms and a separate decontamination room.

The team consists of 26 dentists, eight hygienists, 15 dental nurses, three lab technicians, 12 receptionists and a senior management team.

The practice is owned by an individual who is the principal dentist there. They have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist, the practice manager and two dental nurses. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open to patients:

Monday to Thursday – 8am to 8pm

Friday – 8am to 6pm.

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared clean and well maintained.
  • The provider had infection control procedures which reflected published guidance.
  • Staff knew how to deal with emergencies. Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment was available.
  • The provider had systems to help them manage risk to patients and staff.
  • The provider had suitable safeguarding processes and staff knew their responsibilities for safeguarding vulnerable adults and children.
  • The provider had thorough staff recruitment procedures.
  • The clinical staff provided patients’ care and treatment in line with current guidelines.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The provider had effective leadership and culture of continuous improvement.
  • Staff felt involved and supported and worked well as a team.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider had suitable information governance arrangements.

22 January 2014

During a routine inspection

During our visit we spoke to five people who used the service who told us that they were very satisfied with the treatment they received at the practice. One person told us 'I have been coming here for two years and I am very happy with it all.' People told us that they had enough information about the dentist from the internet and from the information they were given at the practice including information about the costs of treatment. People said they felt informed about the options and choices they had about their treatment and care.

We observed one person receiving treatment and looked at the files of eight people selected at random. We saw that treatment was provided safely and met people's individual needs.

We saw the practice had policies and procedures in place on the prevention and control of infection and that these were implemented and monitored effectively.

People using the service were treated by staff who are qualified to carry out their

work although some of the required documentation needed to confirm that the provider had undertaken procedures to establish that each was of good character were not available.

There were effective comments and complaints systems in place at the practice.