• Doctor
  • Independent doctor

Mayfield Clinic

Mayfield House, 256 Banbury Road, Oxford, Oxfordshire, OX2 7DE (01865) 423425

Provided and run by:
Healthwatch Limited

Latest inspection summary

On this page

Background to this inspection

Updated 30 April 2018

Mayfield Clinic provides the following services from:

Mayfield House

256 Banbury Road

Oxford

OX2 7DE

The services provided which were within CQC’s powers to inspect were:

  • Private GP and nurse appointments which could be booked when required by patients. These could be booked for a number of patient needs including vaccinations, acute conditions, assessments of conditions, home visits among other services.
  • Ongoing management of patient’s medical conditions including therapies and assessments for mental health conditions.
  • Health checks for patients required by employers or as requested by patients.
  • Prescribing of acute medicines for therapeutic reasons.
  • Referrals to external private medical services or recommendations of referrals to patients’ NHS GPs.

The provider managed regulated activities from a main site.

The registered provider is Healthwatch Limited.

The regulated activities registered for are:

  • Diagnostic and screening procedures
  • Surgical procedures
  • Treatment of disease, disorder or injury

Date of inspection, 22 March 2018.

The inspection team included a GP specialist adviser, a lead inspector and a second inspector.

We requested information from the provider before the inspection. During the inspection we spoke with clinical, management and support staff, reviewed clinical and non-clinical documentation and reviewed patient feedback. We also looked at management of emergency medicines, equipment and prescription security.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

  • Is it safe?
  • Is it effective?
  • Is it caring?
  • Is it responsive to people’s needs?
  • Is it well-led?

These questions therefore formed the framework for the areas we looked at during the inspection.

Overall inspection

Updated 30 April 2018

We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection in December 2015 and we identified breaches of regulations. The location was previously registered with CQC under a different name; Oxford Private Medical Practice. Specifically we identified that the provider did not always operate effective governance procedures, identify and implement all staff training needs, manage medicines in line with all guidance or undertake staff checks as required by regulations. We asked the provider to inform us of the action they were going to take in order to ensure compliance with regulations.

We undertook an announced comprehensive inspection in 22 March 2018 to ask the service the following key questions; Are services safe, effective, caring, responsive and well-led?

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found that this service was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found that this service was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found that this service was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found that this service was providing responsive services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found that this service was providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

We carried out this inspection under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. This inspection was planned to check whether the service was meeting the legal requirements and regulations associated with the Health and Social Care Act 2008.

This service is registered with CQC under the Health and Social Care Act 2008 in respect of some, but not all, of the services it provides. There are some exemptions from regulation by CQC which relate to particular types of service and these are set out in Schedule 2 of The Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014.

The services provided which were within CQC’s powers to inspect were:

  • Private GP and nurse appointments which could be booked when required by patients. These could be booked for a number of patient needs including vaccinations, acute conditions, assessments of conditions, home visits among other services.
  • Ongoing management of patient’s medical conditions including therapies and assessments for mental health conditions.
  • Health checks for patients required by employers or as requested by patients.
  • Prescribing of acute medicines for therapeutic reasons.
  • Referrals to external private medical services or recommendations of referrals to patients’ NHS GPs.

There are a mixture of employed staff that provide care including five GPs and nurses. There were a mix of male and female staff.

The provider managed regulated activities from one site. The premises were altered to ensure they were appropriate and safe to provide clinical care.

There is a registered manager in post. A registered manager is a person who is registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.

We received 24 comment cards from patients who use Mayfield Clinic services and all were entirely positive about staff and the service patients had received.

Our key findings were:

  • The provider had systems in place to identify and learn from clinical practice in order to improve services where necessary.
  • Risks associated with the provision of services were well managed.
  • Medicines and related documentation were appropriately managed.
  • The necessary checks required on staff who provided care were in place.
  • Patients received full and detailed explanations of treatment including information enabling informed consent.
  • The service was caring, person centred and compassionate.
  • There were processes for receiving and acting on patient feedback.
  • There were appropriate governance arrangements in place. The provider ensured clinicians maintained an up to date knowledge in their specialism and undertook relevant training and revalidation.
  • There were systems in place to respond to incidents and complaints.

Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP) Chief Inspector of General Practice