We carried out an inspection of Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale Domiciliary Service on 7 and 8 March 2016. We gave the service 48 hours’ notice of our intention to carry out the inspection. This was because the location was a community based service and we needed to be sure that someone would be present in the office.Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale Domiciliary Service is registered to provide personal care to people living in their own home. The service specialised in providing flexible support to people with learning disabilities living in the Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale areas. At the time of the inspection 25 people were using the service.
The service was managed by a registered manager. A registered manager is a person who has registered with the Care Quality Commission to manage the service. Like registered providers, they are ‘registered persons’. Registered persons have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated Regulations about how the service is run.
We last inspected this service on 15 January 2014 and found it was meeting all legal requirements. During this inspection we found the service was meeting the current regulations.
People were happy with the service they received from Burnley, Pendle and Rossendale Domiciliary Service. They told us they felt safe and secure using the service. Staff showed awareness of how to keep people safe and understood the policies and procedures used to safeguard people. Staff were also aware of the procedures to follow to ensure medicines were handled safely.
Individual support plans contained risk assessments. These identified risks and described the measures and actions to be taken to ensure people were protected from the risk of harm. The care records and health action plans demonstrated that people’s health was monitored and referrals were made to health care professionals where necessary for example: their GP or Speech and Language Therapist. People were supported and encouraged to have a healthy diet.
Safe recruitment practices were followed and appropriate checks were undertaken, which helped to ensure suitable staff were employed to care for people. There were sufficient numbers of staff to meet people’s needs. Staff were able to maintain and develop their skills by ongoing training. Staff spoken with confirmed they had access to a range of learning opportunities and told us they were well supported by the registered manager and management team.
Staff followed the principles of the Mental Capacity Act 2005 to ensure that people’s rights were protected where they were unable to make decisions for themselves.
Support records and risk assessments were person-centred and were an accurate reflection of people’s care and support needs. The support plans, person centred plans and one page profiles were written with the person, so they were able to influence the delivery of their care. The support documentation included the person’s likes and preferences and were reviewed to reflect changes to the person’s needs and circumstances.
All people spoken with told us the staff were kind and caring. During the inspection it was evident the staff had a good rapport with people using the service and we were able to observe the positive interactions that took place. We noted the staff were caring, encouraging and attentive when communicating and supporting people.
People were supported to plan and participate in activities that were personalised and meaningful to them. We noted people participated in a wide range of activities and had an activity planner to help them structure their time.
People were aware of how they could raise a complaint or concern if the needed to and had access to an easy read complaints procedure.
The registered manager provided clear leadership and direction and was committed to continuous improvement. People and staff spoken with had confidence in the registered manager and felt the service was well managed. We found there were systems in place to assess and monitor the quality of the service, which included feedback from people using the service.