• Dentist
  • Dentist

Archived: Guildford Dental Centre

26 Farnham Road, Guildford, Surrey, GU2 4JN (01483) 535220

Provided and run by:
Guildford Health Limited

Important: The provider of this service changed. See old profile
Important: The provider of this service changed. See new profile

All Inspections

23 October 2020

During an inspection looking at part of the service

We undertook a focused inspection of Guildford Dental Centre on 23 October 2020. This inspection was carried out to review in detail the actions taken by the registered provider to improve the quality of care and to confirm that the practice was now meeting legal requirements.

The inspection was led by a CQC inspector who was supported remotely by a specialist dental adviser.

We undertook a comprehensive inspection of Guildford Dental Centre on 10 March 2020 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We found the registered provider was not providing safe, effective or well led care and was in breach of regulation 12 and regulation 17 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 (Regulated Activities) Regulations 2014. You can read our report of that inspection by selecting the 'all reports' link for Guildford Dental Centre on our website www.cqc.org.uk.

As part of this inspection we asked: Remove as appropriate:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it well-led?

When one or more of the five questions are not met we require the service to make improvements. We then inspect again after a reasonable interval, focusing on the areas where improvement was required.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice was providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 10 March 2020.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements in relation to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 10 March 2020.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

The provider had made improvements to put right the shortfalls and had responded to the regulatory breaches we found at our inspection on 10 March 2020; however additional information we received highlighted that further improvements were still required.

Background

Guildford Dental Centre is in Guildford, Surrey and provides private treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes three dentists, one dental nurse, three trainee dental nurses, one dental hygienist, one receptionist and a dental nurse/practice manager. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Guildford Dental Centre is the principal dentist.

During the inspection we spoke with the principal dentist and one dental nurse. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

Mondays to Fridays 8am to 5pm

Our key findings were:

  • The provider’s infection prevention and control procedures reflected published guidance.
  • Infection prevention and control audits were carried out every six months to assess and address areas where improvements were needed.
  • Appropriate medicines and life-saving equipment was available in line with guidance.
  • Information relating to the Control of Substances Hazardous to Health Regulations 2002 (COSHH) was available to staff as recommended.
  • There were arrangements to monitor the storage temperature of medicines requiring refrigeration, to ensure their efficacy.
  • Systems were in place to ensure the disposal of out of date medicines and medical equipment.
  • There were systems to carry out audits of dental radiographs, dental implants and antimicrobial prescribing to assess and improve the quality and to ensure compliance with current guidance.
  • Systems had been implemented to ensure patient referrals were monitored and followed up.

We identified regulations the provider was not meeting. They must:

Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care

Full details of the regulation the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Take action to ensure the clinicians take into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice when completing dental care records.

10 March 2020

During a routine inspection

We carried out this announced inspection on 10 March 2020 under Section 60 of the Health and Social Care Act 2008 as part of our regulatory functions. We planned the inspection to check whether the registered provider was meeting the legal requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations. The inspection was led by a Care Quality Commission, (CQC), inspector who was supported by a specialist dental adviser.

To get to the heart of patients’ experiences of care and treatment, we always ask the following five questions:

• Is it safe?

• Is it effective?

• Is it caring?

• Is it responsive to people’s needs?

• Is it well-led?

These questions form the framework for the areas we look at during the inspection.

Our findings were:

Are services safe?

We found this practice not providing safe care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services effective?

We found this practice was not providing effective care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services caring?

We found this practice was providing caring services in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services responsive?

We found this practice was providing responsive care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Are services well-led?

We found this practice was not providing well-led care in accordance with the relevant regulations.

Background

Guildford Dental Centre is in Guildford and provides private dental care and treatment for adults and children.

There is level access to the practice for people who use wheelchairs and those with pushchairs. Car parking spaces, including dedicated parking for people with disabilities, are available near the practice.

The dental team includes four dentists, one dental nurse, three trainee dental nurses, one dental hygienist and one receptionist. The practice has four treatment rooms.

The practice is owned by a company and as a condition of registration must have a person registered with the CQC as the registered manager. Registered managers have legal responsibility for meeting the requirements in the Health and Social Care Act 2008 and associated regulations about how the practice is run. The registered manager at Guildford Dental Centre is the principal dentist.

On the day of inspection, we collected 13 CQC comment cards filled in by patients and spoke with two other patients.

During the inspection we spoke with three dentists, one dental nurse, three trainee dental nurses, and one dental hygienist. We looked at practice policies and procedures and other records about how the service is managed.

The practice is open:

  • Mondays to Fridays 8am to 5pm

Our key findings were:

  • The practice appeared to be visibly clean and well-maintained. Staff knew how to deal with emergencies.
  • The provider had staff recruitment procedures which reflected current legislation.
  • Staff treated patients with dignity and respect and took care to protect their privacy and personal information.
  • Staff provided preventive care and supported patients to ensure better oral health.
  • The appointment system took account of patients’ needs.
  • The provider asked staff and patients for feedback about the services they provided.
  • The provider dealt with complaints positively and efficiently.
  • The provider had information governance arrangements however these were ineffective.
  • The provider must ensure the following:
  • Infection prevention and control procedures are line with guidance.
  • Emergency equipment is provided in line with guidance.
  • Conscious sedation is carried out in accordance with guidance,
  • Control of substances hazardous to health file is completed in line with guidance.
  • Medicines fridge temperature monitoring implemented.
  • Removal of out of date medicines and medical equipment.
  • Dental care records are correctly completed.
  • A full range audits including dental implants, sedation, antibiotic prescribing, radiographs and infection prevention control are implemented.
  • A central referral monitoring system is implemented.
  • An effective staff appraisal system is implemented in line with guidance.

There were areas where the provider could make improvements. They should:

  • Implement audits for prescribing of antibiotic medicines taking into account the guidance provided by the Faculty of General Dental Practice.

We identified regulations the provider was not complying with. They must:

  • Ensure care and treatment is provided in a safe way to patients.
  • Establish effective systems and processes to ensure good governance in accordance with the fundamental standards of care.

Full details of the regulations the provider was not meeting are at the end of this report.

We are mindful of the impact of COVID-19 pandemic on our regulatory function. This meant we took account of the exceptional circumstances arising as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic when considering what enforcement action was necessary and proportionate to keep people safe as a result of this inspection. We will continue to discharge our regulatory enforcement functions required to keep people safe and to hold providers to account where it is necessary for us to do so.