17 November 2022
During an inspection looking at part of the service
We carried out an announced focused inspection at Lawrence House Surgery on 17 November 2022. Overall, the practice is rated as Good.
The ratings for each key question were rated as:
Safe - Good
Effective - Good
Caring - Not inspected, rating of Good carried forward from previous inspection
Responsive - Not inspected, rating of Good carried forward from previous inspection
Well-led - Good
Following our previous inspection on 19 December 2016, the practice was rated Good overall and for the key questions Effective, Caring, Responsive and Well-led. The practice was rated requires improvement for the key question Safe.
The full reports for previous inspections can be found by selecting the ‘all reports’ link for Lawrence House Surgery on our website at www.cqc.org.uk
Why we carried out this inspection
We carried out this inspection in line with our inspection priorities. The focus of the inspection included:
- Inspecting the Safe, Effective and Well-led key questions.
- Following up on areas identified for improvement from previous inspections and remote monitoring activity.
How we carried out the inspection
This inspection was carried out in a way which enabled us to spend a minimum amount of time on site.
This included:
- Completing clinical searches on the practice’s patient records system (this was with consent from the provider and in line with all data protection and information governance requirements).
- Reviewing patient records to identify issues and clarify actions taken by the provider.
- Requesting evidence from the provider.
- A short site visit.
Our findings
We based our judgement of the quality of care at this service on a combination of:
- what we found when we inspected
- information from our ongoing monitoring of data about services and
- information from the provider, patients, the public and other organisations.
We found that:
- The practice provided care in a way that kept patients safe and protected them from avoidable harm.
- Staff interviewed describe a positive working environment and manager/staff relationships. Staff interviewed state they know who to report to if any concerns and staff are clear on roles/responsibilities within the team.
- There is evidence of a strong focus on patient-centred care and innovation within the practice. For example, partners within the practice are well connected with local networks and share learning.
- The practice has an effective system for monitoring staff training records and all staff files looked at had completed all mandatory training in the required time frames.
- Staff spoken with felt supported within their roles and were given appropriate time to pursue additional learning and training.
- Leaders within the practice showed awareness of current issues and had plans in place to address any identified concerns. For example, working on improving access and trialling use of a GP / other staff covering phone lines during early morning busy periods.
- Patients received effective care and treatment that met their needs.
- The way the practice was led and managed promoted the delivery of high-quality, person-centre care.
Whilst we found no breaches of regulations, the provider should:
- Take action to ensure all patients with a Do Not Attempt Cardio Pulmonary Resuscitation (DNACPR) order, and who and are deemed to lack mental capacity in relation to that decision, have a supporting formal capacity assessment available in their clinical record.
- Implement a system to monitor the oxygen levels within the oxygen cylinders when completing checks on the emergency medicines supplies.
- Review the disabled toilet facilities and the use of an emergency pull cord for patients.
- Continue efforts to improve the uptake of childhood immunisations and cervical screening.
Details of our findings and the evidence supporting our ratings are set out in the evidence tables.
Dr Sean O’Kelly BSc MB ChB MSc DCH FRCA
Chief Inspector of Hospitals and Interim Chief Inspector of Primary Medical Services