Background to this inspection
Updated
26 April 2017
St. Clements PCT Medical Services (PCTMS) Practice is one of three practices provided by North Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (NEPT). The practice holds its own patient list of 4004 patients. The other two practices (Dilip Sabnis and The Acorns) are also situated in Grays, Essex. Patients are able to attend any of the practices to access care and treatment. They provide services to a deprived patient population.
We have previously inspected the other two practices and found various breaches of the regulations. As a result of these findings NEPT has put an improvement plan in place across all three practices and at the time of this inspection, some of those improvements had been actioned or were in the process of being actioned.
The clinical team consisted of a permanent female GP employed at St. Clements PCT Medical Service (PTMS) Practice who works four days providing eight clinical sessions. The practice also has three regular locums (two male GPs and one female GP) who work throughout the week. There is a male and female GP available daily. There is a permanent full time practice nurse, a nurse prescriber and a health care assistant at the practice. The practice manager works across all three of the provider’s practices in Grays, Essex. They are being assisted by an external consultancy service providing GP clinical leadership, Trust lead pharmacist and overseen by an operational improvement manager.
The practice is open between 8am and 6.30pm and GP appointments are available between 9am and 5.30pm. The practice nurse appointments are available from 9am to 5.30pm every day except Wednesday. A locum nurse prescriber works at the practice on a Thursday.
The practice does not operate extended hours but the patients benefit from access to an out of hours GP hub service. Appointments are pre-bookable via the practice for both GPs and nurse. In addition, GP appointments may be booked two weeks in advance and the nurse may book up to four weeks in advance. Urgent appointments are available for people that needed them. There are limited parking facilities at St. Clements PCT Medical Service (PTMS) Practice.
Updated
26 April 2017
Letter from the Chief Inspector of General Practice
We carried out an announced comprehensive inspection at St. Clements PCT Medical Services (PCTMS) Practice on 25 January 2017. Overall the practice is rated as requires improvement.
Our key findings across all the areas we inspected were as follows:
- There were systems in place for reporting, recording, investigating, responding and learning from significant events. However, the practice did not evidence consideration of wider risks and that changes had been embedded to mitigate against a reoccurrence.
- There was an effective system in place to receive and respond to Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) alerts. However, historical alerts from prior to 2015 still required actioning.
- The practice achieved 96% of the total points available under Quality and Outcomes Framework (QOF).
- We found there was no defined system in place to disseminate and check adherence to NICE guidance.
- We found some patients were incorrectly coded for health conditions they did not have.
- Improvements were required to ensure timely reviews of medicines and discussions of associated risks.
- There was an absence of clinical audit to inform quality improvement.
- Care plans were not in place for all patients on their admission avoidance programme.
- Patients had been appropriately identified and included in multidisciplinary discussions.
- The practice did not monitor their patient’s attendance for national screening programmes or have specific strategies to improve uptake.
- Data from the national GP patient survey showed patients rated the practice lower than others for many aspects of care. This included satisfaction with the opening hours and ease of contacting the practice by phone.
- Patients we spoke with including members of the patient participation group spoke highly of the care, commitment and professionalism of the practice nurse.
- The practice had identified 0.4% of their patient list as carers and was improving their identification and services to such patients.
- The practice offered a range of services to their patients who could access the practice or North Essex Partnership University NHS Foundation Trust (NEPT) neighbouring practices (The Acorns and Dilip Sabnis).
- The practice followed up on patients who failed to attend their appointments.
- The practice had a complaints procedure. It was accessible and supported patients to make a complaint including their right to advocacy services.
- The Trust responsible for the oversight of the practice had commissioned an external specialist to assist them to develop an overarching strategy regarding how they were to deliver their services individually or across the three practices within Grays, Essex.
- The overarching governance systems had not been effectively embedded into the practice.
- There was a lack of permanent clinical oversight. This role was currently being fulfilled by the external specialist GP advisor in partnership with the pharmacist.
- There was often only remote managerial oversight available for most of the week.
- Regular team meetings had been introduced and rotated between days to ensure all staff had an opportunity to attend and contribute to discussions.
- Systems were in place to support patients to provide feedback. However these were in their infancy and the practice could not demonstrate changes made in response to patient feedback.
Since the date of the inspection, the provider of this service has de-registered this location with the Care Quality Commission and another provider has registered with us. Had this not been the case we would have issued the provider with an improvement action for the following areas.
The areas where the provider must make improvements are:
- Ensure the dissemination and adherence to NICE guidance.
- Conduct reviews of high risk medicines in line with guidance, explaining potential risks to patients.
- Embed accessible and sustainable governance systems and processes to identify and implement quality improvements, including clinical and managerial oversight.
- Ensure the accurate coding of patient records and ensure that care plans are completed for patients on the admission avoidance register.
- Respond to patient feedback and use it to inform changes to the service.
The area where the provider should make improvement is;
- Review and action medicine safety alerts from prior to January 2015.
- Improve the analysis of risks and evidencing of actions taken to mitigate a reoccurrence.
- Monitor patient’s attendance for national screening programmes and improve uptake.
- Improve the identification of patients who are carers.
- Maintain accessible clinical and administrative leadership.
Professor Steve Field (CBE FRCP FFPH FRCGP)
Chief Inspector of General Practice
People with long term conditions
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- Performance for diabetes related indicators were above the national average. For example, the percentage of patients with diabetes, on the register in whom the last IFCC-HbA1C is 64mmol/mol or less in the preceding 12 months was 79%.
- 98% of the practices patients on the diabetic register had the influenza immunisation. This was above the local average by 4.2% and the national average by 2.9%.
- Improvements were required in the practices response to Medicine and Healthcare products Regulatory Agency (MHRA) alerts to ensure that patients with long-term conditions taking certain medicines were safe.
- The practice nurse led on long term conditions and was highly regarded by the patients.
Families, children and young people
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- Patients could access midwifery services at the practice.
- Patient group directives had been appropriately authorised for the administration of immunisations to pregnant women.
- The temperatures of fridges storing vaccines were monitored in line with guidance.
- We saw appropriate written consent was obtained for patients who received contraceptive devices.
- When providing care and treatment for children and young people, staff carried out assessments of capacity to consent in line with relevant guidance. .
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- We found the practice worked with partner services to deliver care to housebound patients.
- The practice participated in admission avoidance but not all patients on their register had care plans as required.
- The practice had systems, processes and practices in place to keep older patients safe and safeguarded from abuse.
- Staff understood the relevant consent and decision-making requirements of legislation and guidance, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005.
Working age people (including those recently retired and students)
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- Patients could access GP and nursing services at all three of the provider’s locations within Grays.
- Weekend appointments with a GP or nurse could be booked at the local GP health hub.
- There was no website to enable patients to translate information or provide useful information such as directions and health promotion advice.
- Patients could book appointments on-line.
- Health screening services were available at the practice and via an external health provider throughout Grays.
People experiencing poor mental health (including people with dementia)
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- The practice achieved above the national average for their management of patients with poor mental health. For example, 100% of their patients with schizophrenia, bipolar affective disorder and other psychoses had a comprehensive care plan documented in their records within the last 12 months.
- The practice achieved 100% for the percentages of their patients diagnosed with dementia receiving a face to face review within the preceding 12 months.
- Clinicians worked with community health professionals to provide dementia screening and for on-going support by the community geriatrician.
- The practice followed up with patients who failed to collect their prescriptions.
People whose circumstances may make them vulnerable
Updated
26 April 2017
The provider was rated as requires improvement for safe, effective, caring, responsive and for well-led. The issues identified as requires improvement overall affected all patients including this population group.
- Literature was available in other languages for non-English speaking patients
- Carers were identified and advised of additional services. The nurse sent text reminders to carers.
- We found the practice worked with partner health services to deliver care to housebound patients.
- The practice had an accessible complaints procedure advising patients of their right to advocacy services and supporting them to make a complaint.
- Staff understood the relevant consent and decision-making requirements of legislation and guidance, including the Mental Capacity Act 2005.