28, 29, 30 November 2016, 01 December 2016
During a routine inspection
Letter from the Chief Inspector of Hospitals
Nottingham CityCare Partnership are a community social enterprise caring for patients across a wide range of services, in home settings or close to home in community settings such as health centres, schools and GP surgeries and in an urgent care centre. It covers the city of Nottingham and also provides a school age immunisations programme in the city of Derby. The organisation employs approximately 1800 staff and serves a population of almost 312,000.
This was the organisation’s first inspection using our comprehensive inspection methodology.
We carried out this comprehensive inspection between the 28 November and 1 December 2016. We also carried out an unannounced inspection of the Urgent Care Centre on the 7 December 2016.
Nottingham CityCare Partnership CIC provides the following core services:
- Community health services for adults
- Community health services for children, young people and families
- Community end of life care
- Urgent care services
Nottingham CityCare Partnership has not been inspected since registration in March 2011.
Headquarters has been inspected on two occasions since registration. There were no previous breaches of regulations against this location.
The NHS Urgent Care Centre was previously inspected on 12 May 2016 in response to concerns. We found that the service provided at the centre was not meeting legal requirements and we set two requirement notices in relation to:
- Regulation 17 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 good governance, as the provider did not have effective systems in place to monitor and manage risk by having sufficient cover to enable staff to triage and see patients in a timely manner.
- Regulation 18 HSCA (RA) Regulations 2014 Staffing, as the provider did not have effective oversight of staffing requirements in order to deploy sufficient numbers to meet demand and have a systematic approach to determine the correct number of staff and range of skills to meet patients’ needs.
Following this inspection of the NHS Urgent Care Centre by our Primary Medical Services and Integrated Care team it was found the service provided at the centre was now meeting legal requirements and as a result, both requirement notices were closed.
We inspected four core services; the end of life care service was rated as outstanding and the remaining three services were rated as good. When aggregating ratings, our inspection teams follow a set of principles to ensure consistent decisions. The principles will normally apply but will be balanced by inspection teams using their discretion and professional judgement in the light of all of the available evidence. On this occasion we found that the provider was working at a level which was consistently good with some elements of outstanding; the provider’s leadership was judged to be outstanding. Therefore, overall we found the provider was performing at a level which led to the judgement of outstanding.
Our key findings were as follows:
- The organisation had a strong focus on quality and safety and providing services that met the local needs of patients. Throughout the inspection we saw how patient safety was at the forefront of the agenda.
- Staffing levels were generally able to meet the needs of patients, although there were some vacancies in the community adults and children, young people and families services. In the urgent care service there had been significant investment in agency staff to temporarily increase staffing levels to a safe level to meet demand in a more timely way. This had made a positive difference on meeting demand and managing workload.
- Patient’s needs were met through the way services were organised and delivered with minimal waiting times across the services. In the end of life care service 100% of patients had died in their preferred place of care. In adult services, between April 2016 and December 2016, the organisation responded to 90% of acute requests within three hours of referral. For referrals that were classed as urgent and requiring a visit within 72 hours their overall performance for the same period was 90%. In the urgent care service there had been a steady improvement in the assessment time of patients since May 2016 with a 17% reduction in the number of patients waiting longer than the 30 minute target time set by the clinical commissioning group (CCG).
- The individual needs of patients were taken into account when planning and delivering services. In the children, young people and families service staff offered home immunisations for hard to reach vulnerable children to ensure they completed their immunisation programme. In adult services a reablement team provided care for patients who required a social care package in order to prevent hospital admission or to facilitate an earlier discharge from hospital. Specialist dementia nurses were available across the organisation to give practical, clinical and emotional support to families living with dementia. The NHS urgent care centre identified carers and those that cared for patients during consultations and were able to signpost support if required.
- The provider had an up-to-date infection control policy, which provided guidance for staff on the prevention and control of infection. Throughout the organisation we observed staff to be compliant with best practice guidelines to prevent and reduce the risk of spreading infection.
- There had been three cases of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) bacteraemia and 23 cases of Clostridium difficile (C.difficile) infection between April and October 2016. Of these, no risk factors or significant lapses in the quality of care provided had been identified.
- Without exception patients were treated with kindness, compassion, dignity and respect throughout all of the services we inspected and feedback from patients, families and carers was consistently positive about the way staff treated them.
We saw several areas of outstanding practice including:
- A medicines compliance review service was available on referral by a health or social care professional for patients who were finding it difficult to manage their medicines due to poor memory, lack of dexterity or swallowing difficulties.
- In addition to the Macmillan specialist palliative care team (SPCT), there was a Macmillan support team. The Macmillan support team was part of a two year pilot which had been brought about because of a lack of provision for patients whose needs were not complex enough to warrant support from the Macmillan SPCT. This enabled patients with cancer to access Macmillan support.
- The end of life service had three virtual hospice beds within the provider’s nursing home. This enabled patients to access respite care 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
- Teams were supportive of each other and aware of the emotional stress of working in end of life care. The Macmillan support team had a ‘sparkling moments’ book, in which they recorded their positive experiences of palliative and end of life care. Although they used this to evidence where they had met their key evaluation points set by the clinical commissioning group (CCG) they also found this a useful exercise to provide positive reflection for the team.
- Nottingham CityCare Partnership along with Nottingham City CCG and Nottingham City Council had won the Health Service Journal ‘Improved Partnerships between health and local government’ award in November 2016. The provider had been recognised for their work in the city’s integrated care programme which aims to provide seamless care for people as well as keeping more people healthier in the community and out of hospital.
- In the NHS urgent care centre the medical director had developed an application which allowed staff to review an anonymised patient record, reflect on the notes and automatically produced a scoring system to highlight areas of good practice. This provided clinical staff with an effective way to self and peer review their decision making, treatment plans and record keeping. This application had been introduced over the last six months and had been utilised voluntarily 42 times by staff (by some staff multiple times) and the final scoring could also be used in appraisals, for development and good practice was celebrated.
Professor Sir Mike Richards
Chief Inspector of Hospitals