An inspector visited this service on 26 August 2014 to carry out an unannounced inspection. Prior to our visit we looked at all the information we hold on this service to help us to plan and focus on our five questions: is the service safe; is the service effective; is the service caring; is the service responsive; and is the service well led?The summary is based on our observations during the inspection, speaking with people using the service, the staff supporting them and from looking at records.
Is the service safe?
We saw that people were treated with respect and dignity by the staff. People living at Staley House Care Home and the visitors we spoke with told us staff respected people's privacy and dignity and supported people in a way that suited their individual needs and personal preferences.
Each person had an individual care file that included risk assessments and a care plan that described how to meet their individual care needs.
Safeguarding procedures were robust and relevant policies were in place to support staff when dealing with any safeguarding matters. People spoken with told us they felt safe and visitors told us they were satisfied their relative was safe from harm. One comment was 'The staff are very friendly and kind, I can't fault the staff in any way.'
During our inspection visit we looked at the premises which were fit for purpose and we saw there were systems in place to manage the on-going maintenance of the home.
We looked at three staff recruitment records and saw that the provider had robust recruitment procedures in place and all appropriate pre-employment safety checks had been undertaken prior to the person starting work. This meant that people were cared for and supported by suitably qualified, skilled and experienced staff.
Is the service effective?
Prior to people being admitted into the home the manager or deputy manager visited people in their own environment to carry out an assessment of their needs. This was to ensure the home was suitable to facilitate meeting all of those assessed needs unless the admission was an emergency admission. The service had an appropriate emergency admission policy in place.
The manager said that if possible people were encouraged to visit the home and spend some time meeting staff and other people living at the home before a decision was made about moving in.
Staff told us told us that the staff team all worked well together and provided a high standard of care.
Discussions with the manager and staff and observing care delivery demonstrated that the staff on duty had the relevant knowledge about each person's needs and the relevant skills to support and meet those needs.
Is the service caring?
The atmosphere in the home felt relaxed and friendly. From our observations we saw that care staff had a good understanding of people's individual needs and personalities. We saw that staff were kind and sensitive in their approach to people. People commented, 'The staff do look after us but they are very busy' and 'They [the staff] do treat me nicely and they are very good'.
We observed that people looked well cared for and were appropriately dressed.
One regular visitor to the service told us, 'They [the staff] have got to know {[their relative] very well and I have no worries at all about the care'.' Another visitor said 'I would recommend this this home it is very good.'.
Is the service responsive?
We saw that where appropriate the service had accessed advice and support from other health care professionals. For example, we saw evidence of visits from the GP, the district nurse, mental health teams, the chiropodist and people were supported to attend relevant hospital appointments.
We also saw that where people presented with behaviour that challenged, the manager had liaised with the person's community psychiatric nurse about the best action to take. This meant that people using the service received co-ordinated care and support.
The service had systems in place to ensure that people were regularly consulted about their views and ideas on how the home should be run. This was done by means of regular informal chats with people and satisfaction surveys. We saw evidence of these surveys being carried out on a regular basis, following which an analysis of the findings would be undertaken by the providers and a report produced.
Regular visitors to the home told us they were very happy with the standard of care and support provided to their relative. Comments included, 'Everything here is really good, they always get the doctor right away if needed and inform me straight away' and 'They treat me and [their relative] very well.'
Is the service well led?
The service was led by a manager that is registered with the Care Quality Commission.
The manager was described by staff and visitors as approachable and supportive. One visitor said 'If I had any worries I would tell the manager straight away, she is very, very good.'
We saw there were systems in place to monitor the quality of service and identify risk. This would help to ensure that people received a safe and effective service.