• Services in your home
  • Homecare service

Blossom Home Care Leeds & Wakefield

Overall: Good read more about inspection ratings

Brabazon House, 2 Turnberry Park Road, Gildersome, Morley, Leeds, LS27 7LE (0113) 323 0071

Provided and run by:
CW & DK Limited

Report from 30 October 2024 assessment

On this page

Responsive

Good

Updated 15 November 2024

This is the first inspection for this newly registered service. This key question has been rated good. The registered manager understood the diverse health and care needs of people and their local communities. They aimed to provide care, which was joined-up, flexible and supported choice and continuity. The registered manager advocated person-centred care and were quick to respond to any relevant changes in people’s needs. People felt the registered manager and staff listened to them. Most people felt the service acted on any concerns. The systems in place made it easy for people to share feedback and ideas or raise complaints about their care and support. Information was provided in appropriate, accurate and up-to-date formats that could be tailored to individual needs. There were no active complaints. The registered manager ensured everyone could access the care, support and treatment they need when they need it. We found that care records were written in a person-centred way which assisted staff to understand how people wanted their care and support to be delivered. The provider had systems in place to support people to plan for important life changes, so people had time to make informed decisions about their future, including at the end of their life.

This service scored 75 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

Person-centred Care

Score: 3

People spoke positively about the care they received and told us they were involved in their assessment and ongoing plan of care. Feedback was sought through surveys, calls, regular meetings with the management team and also dynamically through the care app used by the provider after each care visit. One relative told us, “Caring is done well and they think outside the box to make best use of their time and just do what needs to be done without fuss.”

Staff ensured they consistently provided care and support, which was tailored to each person’s needs. One staff member told us, "We have clients care plans accessible through the work app, management always notifies us if any alterations happen."

Care provision, Integration and continuity

Score: 3

People received well-coordinated and generally consistent care from staff who knew them well. One relative told us, “They provide a light touch level of care which encourages mum to remain as independent as she can, doing as much as she can, without fear.”

Staff told us they were given clear guidance and training around how to support people, recognise changes in their needs and when to contact external healthcare professionals. One of the management team told us they supported a very intensive care package. “I contact carers every day to check on them. I visit 3 times a week to support them but also do I need to escalate anything. I attend the monthly meetings every month with the family. They can tell me how it is and I can tell them the same.”

Although we reached out to partner agencies for feedback, we did not receive any responses.

The registered manager had worked to foster positive relationships with health and social care professionals when they established the company. Processes were in place to support a range of healthcare professionals to be involved in people’s care.

Providing Information

Score: 3

People told us they received information in a format, which suited their needs. Many people told us they liked the app used by the provider so they could see exactly who had visited and when and they could view notes about people's health or raise a concern. However some people told us they weren’t aware of this facility and would like to use it so this was fed back to the management team for action.

Staff were aware they could provide information in different ways and tailor these to suit people’s needs.

Policies and procedures were in place in relation to the Accessible Information Standard and GDPR.

Listening to and involving people

Score: 3

People knew how to raise a complaint if they wished to. One person told us, " I am occasionally asked to change the time of a call if there is some training or something like that happening, but they always phone me from the office first to ask.”

Staff made sure people always had the opportunity to share their views about how the service was working for them. Staff understood the provider’s complaints procedure. They were encouraged to gather people’s feedback and treat any concern as a complaint.

A complaints procedure was in place. People and relatives knew how to raise concerns and did so when needed. There were processes in place to make sure any concerns were investigated, and lessons were learnt from them. People were involved in decisions about their care. The management team valued feedback they received as they wanted the service to be constantly improving.

Equity in access

Score: 3

The registered manager ensured everyone could access the care, support and treatment they needed when they need it. People and their families said staff supported them well.

Staff understood how to ensure people had access to equitable to health and social care services. People's care records showed they had access to care, support and referrals were made for treatment when they needed it.

The service had a clear process and criteria for accepting referrals and this detailed the level of support the team could offer. The registered manager made sure care records detailed how to access care and support people might need. They made sure initial assessment care records contained pertinent information about people’s needs and preferences, which supported staff to provide appropriate care.

Equity in experiences and outcomes

Score: 3

There was a positive culture within the staff team and staff tailored care and support to meet people’s diverse needs. Staff were aware of people who were at risk of potential discrimination and ensured appropriate support was in place for them.

Staff completed equality and diversity training and observations confirmed staff respected people. The registered manager actively listened to people who were most at risk of experiencing inequality. One staff member told us "I feel like professionally and personally management are very supportive. I couldn’t be happier with the team and management that I work with."

Policies and procedures were in place in relation to equity, equality and diversity.

Planning for the future

Score: 3

No one was receiving end of life care, but we found staff worked with people to understand their wishes for the future.

Staff had received training in planning for and providing end of life care and were aware of best practice. The registered manager promoted a positive, person-centred culture. The staff put people’s needs and wishes at the heart of everything they did.

The registered manager had ensured policies and procedures were in place around providing care for people reaching the end of their life. They told us of good working relationships with community teams to ensure people received good quality care at the end of their life.