Royal Surrey NHS Foundation Trust

On this page

• Overview
• Shared direction and culture
• Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders
• Freedom to speak up
• Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion
• Governance, management and sustainability
• Partnerships and communities
• Learning, improvement and innovation

We assessed one quality statement from this key question to assess the quality of care. We did not assess enough quality statements to rate this key question. We found that there was a good governance structure in place.

This service scored 0 (out of 100) for this area. Find out what we look at when we assess this area and How we calculate these scores.

We did not look at Shared direction and culture during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.

We did not look at Capable, compassionate and inclusive leaders during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.

We did not look at Freedom to speak up during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.

We did not look at Workforce equality, diversity and inclusion during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.

There were monthly clinical governance meetings. All members of the multidisciplinary team attended these meetings and reviewed the care they provided. At the meeting they review data relating to patients’ length of stay, to ensure that patients are in hospital for the shortest time necessary. They also reviewed incidents to identify learning and improve safety. Ward managers shared information with the wider team via emails, at handovers and where appropriate displayed information on notice boards, to improve the quality of care provided. Staff told us that managers were visible and approachable and that they had regular supervision.

We did not look at Partnerships and communities during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.

We did not look at Learning, improvement and innovation during this assessment. The score for this quality statement is based on the previous rating for Well-led.